Legal Opinion

In Re Disbarment of Ithamar Tracy

Supreme Court of Minnesota

Decided March 27, 1936No. 29,482PublishedCited by 27 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

1 Reported in 266 N.W. 88, 267 N.W. 142. The accusations of misconduct against Mr. Tracy were made by three petitions of the State Board of Law Examiners, the original having been followed by two supplements. The evidence under the first was taken before the Honorable John A. Roeser, judge of the seventh judicial district, as referee, and that under the supplemental petitions before the Honorable Gustavus Loevinger, judge of the second judicial district. Our consideration of the case has been much aided by their exhaustive findings of the facts.

Mr. Tracy is now past 40 years of age. He was…

2Cases cited37 opinions

  1. Ex Parte GarlandSupreme Court of the United States · 1867
  2. People Ex Rel. Karlin v. CulkinNew York Court of Appeals · 1928
  3. Matter of RoussNew York Court of Appeals · 1917
  4. Ex Parte SecombeSupreme Court of the United States · 1857
  5. People Ex Rel. Illinois State Bar Ass'n v. Peoples Stock Yards State BankIllinois Supreme Court · 1931

32 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by27 opinions

  1. In re Clerk of Lyon County Courts' CompensationSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1976
  2. In Re the Disbarment of GillardSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1978
  3. Sharood v. HatfieldSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1973
  4. State v. McCoySupreme Court of Minnesota · 2004
  5. Gardner v. ConwaySupreme Court of Minnesota · 1951

22 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API