Legal Opinion
State v. McKee
Ohio Supreme Court
Decided April 11, 2001No. 2000-0523PublishedCited by 24 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
[This decision has been published in Ohio Official Reports at 91 Ohio St.3d 292.] THE STATE OF OHIO, APPELLANT, v. MCKEE, APPELLEE. [Cite as State v. McKee,
2001-Ohio-41.] Evidence—Witnesses—Experience and knowledge of a drug user lay witness can establish competence to express an opinion on the identity of a controlled substance, when. (Nos. 00-523 and 00-953—Submitted December 12, 2000—Decided April 11, 2001.) APPEAL from and CERTIFIED by the Court of Appeals for Marion County, No. 9-99-57. __________________ SYLLABUS OF THE COURT The experience and knowledge of a drug user lay witness can…
2Cases cited27 opinions
- United States v. OlanoSupreme Court of the United States · 1993
- Johnson v. ZerbstSupreme Court of the United States · 1938
- United States v. FradySupreme Court of the United States · 1982
- Johnson v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1997
- United States v. YoungSupreme Court of the United States · 1985
22 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by24 opinions
- State v. Delmanzo, 2007-L-218 (11-3-2008)Ohio Court of Appeals · 2008
- State v. PrimeauOhio Court of Appeals · 2012
- State v. Clark, 88731 (7-26-2007)Ohio Court of Appeals · 2007
- State v. Cox, Ca2008-03-028 (3-2-2009)Ohio Court of Appeals · 2009
- State v. Cooper, Unpublished Decision (2-23-2006)Ohio Court of Appeals · 2006
19 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.