Legal Opinion
Grooms v. Marlboro County School District
Court of Appeals of South Carolina
Decided February 10, 1992No. 1765PublishedCited by 4 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
Goolsby, Judge:
This action involves the South Carolina Tort Claims Act, S.C. Code Ann. §§ 15-78-10 et seq. (Supp. 1991). John Thomas Grooms (Tommy) sued the Marlboro County School District under the act for injuries he received while attending a school operated by the school district. The trial court granted the school district’s motion for summary judgment on the grounds that Tommy presented no evidence that the school district exercised in a grossly negligent manner its duty to supervise students in its school, including Tommy, and that the loss suffered by Tommy resulted from an exercise…
2Cases cited7 opinions
- Foster v. South Carolina Department of Highways & Public TransportationSupreme Court of South Carolina · 1992
- Hicks v. McCANDLISHSupreme Court of South Carolina · 1952
- Niver v. S.C. Department of Highways & Public TransportationCourt of Appeals of South Carolina · 1990
- Richardson Ex Rel. McDaniel v. HambrightSupreme Court of South Carolina · 1988
- Anderson v. BallengerSupreme Court of South Carolina · 1932
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by4 opinions
- Staubes v. City of Folly BeachCourt of Appeals of South Carolina · 1998
- Clyburn v. Sumter County School District 17Court of Appeals of South Carolina · 1993
- Cunningham ex rel. Grice v. Helping Hands, Inc.Court of Appeals of South Carolina · 2001
- Clyburn v. Sumter County School District 17Court of Appeals of South Carolina · 1993