Legal Opinion
Yustick v. Eli Lilly and Co.
District Court, E.D. Michigan
Decided November 9, 1983No. Civ. A. 80-70889PublishedCited by 8 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
GILMORE, District Judge.
This is a products liability diversity action for injuries allegedly sustained as a result of the ingestion of diethylstilbestrol (DES) by plaintiff’s mother while she was pregnant with plaintiff in 1952. In January 1973, plaintiff became aware of her alleged injuries and that the generic drug DES was involved. Despite diligent efforts, she did not discover until August 1979 which of the several DES manufacturers selling the drug had actually manufactured and sold the drug her mother consumed. The instant lawsuit was filed on February 8, 1980.
The issue is when…
2Cases cited15 opinions
- Johnson v. Railway Express Agency, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1975
- United States v. KubrickSupreme Court of the United States · 1979
- Guaranty Trust Co. v. YorkSupreme Court of the United States · 1945
- Guaranty Trust Co. v. YorkSupreme Court of the United States · 1945
- Summers v. TiceCalifornia Supreme Court · 1948
10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by8 opinions
- Moll v. Abbott LaboratoriesMichigan Supreme Court · 1993
- Larson v. Johns-Manville Sales Corp.Michigan Supreme Court · 1986
- Brown v. Drake-Willock International, LtdMichigan Court of Appeals · 1995
- Thomas v. Process Equipment Corp.Michigan Court of Appeals · 1986
- Orear v. International Paint Co.Court of Appeals of Washington · 1990
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.