Legal Opinion
State v. Kalman
Connecticut Appellate Court
Decided January 10, 2006No. AC 24788PublishedCited by 8 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
Opinion
McLACHLAN, J.
The defendant, Robert Kalman, appeals from the judgment of the trial court, rendered after a trial to the court, convicting him of the crime of possession of an assault weapon in violation of General Statutes § 53-202C. On appeal, the defendant claims that the court violated his due process rights by (1) concluding that a Maadi MISR firearm is a prohibited assault weapon under General Statutes (Rev. to 1999) § 53-202a 2 and (2) failing to conclude that § 53-202a is vague as applied to him under the circumstances of this case. We disagree and affirm the judgment of the…
2Cases cited8 opinions
- State v. GoldingSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1989
- State v. PeelerSupreme Court of Connecticut · 2004
- Benjamin v. BaileySupreme Court of Connecticut · 1995
- State v. MirandaSupreme Court of Connecticut · 2005
- Eastern Connecticut Cable Television, Inc. v. Town of MontvilleSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1980
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by8 opinions
- Duplissie v. DevinoConnecticut Appellate Court · 2006
- Commissioner of Public Safety v. Freedom of Information CommissionConnecticut Appellate Court · 2012
- Magee v. Commissioner of CorrectionConnecticut Appellate Court · 2008
- State v. PrazeresConnecticut Appellate Court · 2006
- State v. GrantConnecticut Appellate Court · 2011
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.