Legal Opinion
State v. Grant
Connecticut Appellate Court
Decided April 5, 2011No. AC 31318PublishedCited by 5 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
Opinion
PELLEGRINO, J.
The defendant, Carl Grant, appeals from the judgment of conviction, rendered after a jury trial, of possession of cocaine in violation of General Statutes § 2 la-279 (a), possession of narcotics with intent to sell in violation of General Statutes § 21a-277 (a), possession of narcotics with intent to sell within 1500 feet of a public housing project in violation of General Statutes § 21a-278a (b) and interfering with an officer in violation of General Statutes § 53a-167a. On appeal, the defendant claims that (1) the court improperly admitted hearsay evidence at trial, (2)…
2Cases cited10 opinions
- In Re WINSHIPSupreme Court of the United States · 1970
- State v. GoldingSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1989
- State v. DenbySupreme Court of Connecticut · 1995
- State v. PerkinsSupreme Court of Connecticut · 2004
- State v. HedgeSupreme Court of Connecticut · 2010
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by5 opinions
- Johnson v. Board of EducationConnecticut Appellate Court · 2011
- State v. OcasioConnecticut Appellate Court · 2013
- State v. GrantSupreme Court of Connecticut · 2011
- State v. ReddickConnecticut Appellate Court · 2014
- State v. RodriguezConnecticut Appellate Court · 2013