Peterson v. Tufts
Nebraska Supreme Court
Error to the district court for Douglas county. Tried below before Davis, J. cited : McCormick v. Stevenson, 13 Neb., 72. cited: Garwood v. Garwood, 4 Hal. [N. J. L.], 193; Daniels v. Sorrells, 9 Ala., 436; Tutwiler v. Montgomery, 73 Id., 263.
1Opinion of the CourtNorval, J.
On August 11, 1888, and for some time prior thereto, William R. Eaton and M. A. Eaton were engaged in the confectionery business in Omaha, under the firm name of Eaton Bros. On that day two attachment suits were commenced against them, one in favor of Henry J. Druce, and the other by McCague Bros. The writs of attachment were delivered to Louis Peterson, plaintiff in error, as constable for execution. The officer attached the stock of Eaton Bros., the attachment of Druce having priority. In the stock was the soda water fountain in controversy in this suit.
On the 25th day of August, 1888,…
2Cases cited3 opinions
- Daniel v. SorrellsSupreme Court of Alabama · 1846
- Tutwiler v. MontgomerySupreme Court of Alabama · 1882
- Aultman, Miller & Co. v. MalloryNebraska Supreme Court · 1876
3Cited by8 opinions
- Crumrine v. ReynoldsWyoming Supreme Court · 1904
- D. M. Osborne Co. v. Plano Manufacturing Co.Nebraska Supreme Court · 1897
- Campbell Printing Press & Manufacturing Co. v. DyerNebraska Supreme Court · 1896
- Universal CIT Credit Corporation v. VogtNebraska Supreme Court · 1957
- Richardson Drug Co. v. TeasdallNebraska Supreme Court · 1897
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.