Richardson Drug Co. v. Teasdall
Nebraska Supreme Court
Error from the district court of Lancaster county. Tried below before Harr, J.
1Opinion of the Court
Ragan, C.
On January 27, 1892, the Richardson Drug Company and the Lincoln Paint & Color Company, hereinafter called the Drug Company, owned a stock of drugs, together with a lot of drug-store fixtures, including a soda fountain, then situate in a building in the city of Lincoln, and on said date, in consideration of $2,000 sold and delivered possession of said stock of goods to Alice M. and Thomas L. Teasdall, hereinafter called the Teasdalls. The contract of sale between said parties was evidenced by a writing of that date, which, so far as material here, was in words and figures as follows:
“…
2Cases cited10 opinions
- Blanchard v. CookeMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1887
- Bradshaw v. WarnerIndiana Supreme Court · 1876
- Hodson v. WarnerIndiana Supreme Court · 1877
- Aultman, Miller & Co. v. MalloryNebraska Supreme Court · 1876
- McCormick v. StevensonNebraska Supreme Court · 1882
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by5 opinions
- Robinson v. BoweCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1934
- Rider v. CottleWashington Supreme Court · 1949
- Firpo v. Superior CourtCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1926
- Lamb v. UtleyMichigan Supreme Court · 1906
- Richardson Drug Co. v. OberfelderNebraska Supreme Court · 1899