Legal Opinion

Boyle v. Lampe

California Court of Appeal

Decided December 23, 1963No. Civ. No. 27618PublishedCited by 1 opinion

1Opinion of the CourtWood, P. J.

Defendant’s demurrer to the three purported causes of action in the first amended complaint (except as to a portion of the third cause of action) was sustained without leave to amend. Plaintiff appeals from the judgment of dismissal entered upon the order sustaining the demurrer.

The first cause of action alleges: Defendant Lampe is the executor of the will of Charles W. Boyle, deceased. Decedent was indebted to plaintiff as follows: for the care, maintenance, medical and funeral expenses of decedent’s mother, Mrs. Trautman; for the funeral expenses of decedent’s brother, Harry Boyle; and for…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. Biewend v. BiewendCalifornia Supreme Court · 1941
  2. State of Ohio ex rel. Squire v. PorterCalifornia Supreme Court · 1942

3Cited by1 opinion

  1. Klingebiel v. Lockheed Aircraft CorporationDistrict Court, N.D. California · 1971

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API