Legal Opinion

State ex rel. Pleban v. Industrial Commission

Ohio Supreme Court

Decided May 14, 1997No. 95-231PublishedCited by 7 opinions

1Per curiam

This controversy stems largely from a confusing regional board order. The order vacated the finding of permanency underlying the denial of compensation without vacating the denial itself. To the contrary, it specifically “[a]ffirmed [the order in] all other respects.”

Claimant essentially argues that the vacation of the permanency finding compels the issuance of temporary total disability compensation. This is incorrect. The lack of “some evidence” supporting a denial of temporary total disability compensation does not equate to “some evidence” supporting its award. State ex rel. Lampkins v.…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. State ex rel. Gay v. MihmOhio Supreme Court · 1994
  2. State ex rel. Ramirez v. Industrial CommissionOhio Supreme Court · 1982
  3. State ex rel. Lampkins v. Dayton Malleable, Inc.Ohio Supreme Court · 1989
  4. State ex rel. Case v. Industrial CommissionOhio Supreme Court · 1986
  5. State ex rel. Kaska v. Industrial CommissionOhio Supreme Court · 1992

3Cited by7 opinions

  1. State ex rel. Yellow Freight System, Inc. v. Industrial CommissionOhio Supreme Court · 1998
  2. State ex rel. Yellow Freight Sys., Inc. v. Indus. Comm.Ohio Supreme Court · 1998
  3. State ex rel. Hall v. Marion Dresser Industries, Inc.Ohio Supreme Court · 1997
  4. State ex rel. Pleban v. Indus. Comm.Ohio Supreme Court · 1997
  5. State Ex Rel. Wagner v. Vi-Cas Mfg. Co., 06ap-405 (5-17-2007)Ohio Court of Appeals · 2006

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API