Legal Opinion

McGurren v. City of Fargo

North Dakota Supreme Court

Decided September 30, 1954No. 7368PublishedCited by 10 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

GRIMSON, Judge.

The plaintiff brings this action, both individually and on behalf of all others similarly situated, against the City of Fargo, a municipal corporation, for an injunction to prevent the addition of fluoride compounds to the municipal water supply. In his amended complaint alleges that he is a resident, freeholder and taxpayer in the City of Fargo, a municipal corporation; that the defendant, City of Fargo, acting in a proprietary capacity, and for compensation, furnishes water to the residents of the city; that on the 8th day of April 1952, the defendant, acting through the city…

2Cases cited19 opinions

  1. City of Fargo v. SathreNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 1949
  2. Viestenz v. Arthur TownshipNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 1952
  3. Torgerson v. Minneapolis, St. Paul & Sault Ste. Marie Railway Co.North Dakota Supreme Court · 1923
  4. Weber v. LewisNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 1910
  5. Bourke v. Olcott Water Co.Supreme Court of Vermont · 1911

14 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by10 opinions

  1. Matter of Estate of HillNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 1992
  2. Harvey v. PrallSupreme Court of Iowa · 1959
  3. State Ex Rel. Burgum v. HookerNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 1957
  4. Schroeder v. Dane County Board of AdjustmentCourt of Appeals of Wisconsin · 1999
  5. Paduano v. City of New YorkNew York Supreme Court · 1965

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API