Legal Opinion
Paduano v. City of New York
New York Supreme Court
Decided February 15, 1965PublishedCited by 9 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtJoseph A. Brust, J.
In this action wherein plaintiffs, as taxpayers, seek to enjoin pendente lite and permanently, the proposed program for the fluoridation of the municipal water supply of New York City, there are two applications before this court, (1) plaintiffs’ application for a temporary injunction, and (2) defendants’ cross motion for an order dismissing the complaint.
Plaintiffs assert numerous causes which may be placed into two main categories. They assert that there were procedural defects in the manner in which the fluoridation program was adopted; specifically concerning the manner of appropriating…
2Cases cited28 opinions
- Jacobson v. MassachusettsSupreme Court of the United States · 1905
- Ferguson v. SkrupaSupreme Court of the United States · 1963
- Williams v. Mayor of BaltimoreSupreme Court of the United States · 1933
- Matter of ViemeisterNew York Court of Appeals · 1904
- Matter of Stracquadanio v. Dept. of HealthNew York Court of Appeals · 1941
23 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by9 opinions
- Minn. State Bd. of Health v. City of BrainerdSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1976
- Safe Water Foundation of Texas v. City of Houston, Texas Court of Appeals, 1st District (Houston)1983
- Opinion of the JusticesSupreme Court of Delaware · 1968
- Paduano v. City of New YorkAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1965
- Davis v. City of New YorkNew York Supreme Court · 1966
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.