State v. Girley
Court of Appeals of North Carolina
1Opinion of the Court
MORRIS, Judge.
Defendant first contends that the trial court erred in denying him the right to advise the jury on the law of self-defense during the voir dire, to conduct a reasonable examination on that subject, and to ask the jury if they believed in such a defense. Pursuant to G.S. 9-15(a), the court may question and “ . . . direct oral inquiry of any prospective juror as to the fitness and competency of any person to serve as a juror . . . . ” In State v. Dawson, 281 N.C. 645, 654, 190 S.E. 2d 196 (1972), Chief Justice Bobbitt noted that:
“Although G.S. 9-15 (a) assures a defendant of the…
2Cases cited2 opinions
- State v. DooleySupreme Court of North Carolina · 1974
- State v. DawsonSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1972
3Cited by3 opinions
- State v. PattersonCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 1981
- State v. ReidCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 1981
- State v. WoodsonCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 1976