Legal Opinion

State v. Girley

Court of Appeals of North Carolina

Decided November 5, 1975No. 755SC431PublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

MORRIS, Judge.

Defendant first contends that the trial court erred in denying him the right to advise the jury on the law of self-defense during the voir dire, to conduct a reasonable examination on that subject, and to ask the jury if they believed in such a defense. Pursuant to G.S. 9-15(a), the court may question and “ . . . direct oral inquiry of any prospective juror as to the fitness and competency of any person to serve as a juror . . . . ” In State v. Dawson, 281 N.C. 645, 654, 190 S.E. 2d 196 (1972), Chief Justice Bobbitt noted that:

“Although G.S. 9-15 (a) assures a defendant of the…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. State v. DooleySupreme Court of North Carolina · 1974
  2. State v. DawsonSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1972

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. State v. PattersonCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 1981
  2. State v. ReidCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 1981
  3. State v. WoodsonCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 1976

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API