State v. Woodson
Court of Appeals of North Carolina
1Opinion of the Court
VAUGHN, Judge.
It is not necessary to state the facts except to say that there was ample evidence to sustain the verdict of the jury. There must be a new trial, nevertheless, because of errors in the charge. Defendant admitted shooting the victim. Defendant was standing on the porch of his home when he fired the shot. Defendant’s evidence was calculated to show that he shot in self-defense.
Defendant contends that the judge failed to declare and explain the law arising upon the evidence as it related to defendant’s right to defend himself in his home. The exception is well taken and requires a…
2Cases cited4 opinions
- State v. DooleySupreme Court of North Carolina · 1974
- State v. PoplinSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1953
- State v. GirleyCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 1975
- State v. HuntCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 1976
3Cited by2 opinions
- State v. HutchinsonCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1980
- State v. HutchinsonCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1980