Legal Opinion

Inlet Harbour v. South Carolina Department of Parks, Recreation & Tourism

Supreme Court of South Carolina

Decided March 17, 2008No. 26459PublishedCited by 18 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Chief Justice TOAL:

This appeal arises out of a dispute involving road access to oceanfront property in Murrells Inlet, South Carolina. The crux of this matter is the scope of an easement over a private road implied in a deed from Respondent Inlet Harbour, a South Carolina general partnership, to the South Carolina Department of Parks, Recreation and Tourism. The trial court held that the implied easement was limited in scope and the Department of Parks, Recreation and Tourism appealed. We affirm.

Factual/Procedural Background

The circumstances giving rise to this case are best explained by way…

2Cases cited7 opinions

  1. Townes Associates, Ltd. v. City of GreenvilleSupreme Court of South Carolina · 1976
  2. Tupper v. Dorchester CountySupreme Court of South Carolina · 1997
  3. Jowers v. HornsbySupreme Court of South Carolina · 1987
  4. Boyd v. BellSouth Telephone Telegraph Co.Supreme Court of South Carolina · 2006
  5. Blue Ridge Realty Co. v. WilliamsonSupreme Court of South Carolina · 1965

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by18 opinions

  1. Ahrens v. StateSupreme Court of South Carolina · 2011
  2. Murrells Inlet Corp. v. WardCourt of Appeals of South Carolina · 2008
  3. Straight v. GossCourt of Appeals of South Carolina · 2009
  4. Bundy v. ShirleySupreme Court of South Carolina · 2015
  5. Spur at Williams Brice Owners Ass'n v. LallaCourt of Appeals of South Carolina · 2015

13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API