Legal Opinion
Bundy v. Shirley
Supreme Court of South Carolina
Decided May 6, 2015No. Appellate Case 2013-001263; 27520PublishedCited by 9 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtJustice Beatty
In this declaratory judgment action, W. H. Bundy, Jr. sought a determination of whether Bobby Brent Shirley established a prescriptive easement over a road on rural property owned by Bundy. The special referee found Shirley was entitled to the easement. The Court of Appeals reversed. Bundy v. Shirley, Op. No. 2013-UP-153, 2013 WL 8507861 (S.C.Ct.App. filed May 8, 2013). This Court granted Shirley’s petition for a writ of certiorari to review the decision of the Court of Appeals. We affirm as modified.
I. Factual/Procedural History
As stipulated by the parties, the Bundy property traced back to…
2Cases cited29 opinions
- Morrissey v. BrewerSupreme Court of the United States · 1972
- Townes Associates, Ltd. v. City of GreenvilleSupreme Court of South Carolina · 1976
- Wilder Corp. v. WilkeSupreme Court of South Carolina · 1998
- Curtis v. StateSupreme Court of South Carolina · 2001
- Felts v. Richland CountySupreme Court of South Carolina · 1991
24 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by9 opinions
- Simmons v. Berkeley Electric Cooperative, Inc.Supreme Court of South Carolina · 2016
- Lollis v. DuttonCourt of Appeals of South Carolina · 2017
- Protection & Advocacy for People with Disabilities, Inc. v. BuscemiCourt of Appeals of South Carolina · 2016
- Gooldy v. Storage Center-Platt Springs, LLCSupreme Court of South Carolina · 2018
- Gooldy v. Storage Center-Platt Springs, LLCCourt of Appeals of South Carolina · 2015
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.