Legal Opinion
Bee Machine Co. v. Freeman
District Court, D. Massachusetts
Decided January 16, 1942No. 1224PublishedCited by 6 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
BREWSTER, District Judge.
The plaintiff brought an action of contract against the defendant in the State court. The action was based solely upon alleged breach of defendant’s agreements contained in a license agreement relating to the manufacture and sale of devices covered by Letters Patent owned or controlled by the defendant.
This action was removed to this court where the defendant moved for a summary judgment under Rule 56 of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure, 28 U.S.C.A. following section 723c. This motion, after hearing, was allowed on the ground that the doctrine of res adjudicata…
2Cases cited7 opinions
- Lambert Run Coal Co. v. Baltimore & Ohio RailroadSupreme Court of the United States · 1922
- General Investment Co. v. Lake Shore & Michigan Southern Railway Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1922
- United States v. Cooper Corp.Supreme Court of the United States · 1941
- Geddes v. Anaconda Copper Mining Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1921
- Carroll v. Warner Bros. Pictures, Inc.District Court, S.D. New York · 1937
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by6 opinions
- Freeman v. Bee MacHine Co., IncSupreme Court of the United States · 1943
- American Optical Co. v. New Jersey Optical Co.District Court, D. Massachusetts · 1943
- Gold Fuel Service, Inc. v. Esso Standard Oil Co.New Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · 1959
- Bee Mach. Co. v. FreemanDistrict Court, D. Massachusetts · 1943
- Freeman v. Bee MacHine Co., IncSupreme Court of the United States · 1943
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.