Bee Mach. Co. v. Freeman
District Court, D. Massachusetts
1Opinion of the Court
FORD, District Judge.
The plaintiff has renewed its motion, originally filed July 9, 1941, to amend its-complaint by adding a claim for treble damages under the anti-trust laws of the United States. The motion was originally denied by this court for lack of jurisdiction, D.C., 42 F.Supp. 938. Cf. 15 U.S. C.A. § 15. On November 6,1942, the United! States Circuit Court of Appeals, 131 F.2d 190, for this circuit vacated the judgment of the district court (affirmed United States. Supreme Court June 1, 1943, 319 U.S. 448, 63 S.Ct. 1146, 87 L.Ed. 1509) and remanded the case for further proceedings…
2Cases cited3 opinions
- Freeman v. Bee MacHine Co., IncSupreme Court of the United States · 1943
- Bee Mach. Co. v. FreemanCourt of Appeals for the First Circuit · 1942
- Bee Machine Co. v. FreemanDistrict Court, D. Massachusetts · 1942