Legal Opinion

Bauer v. Ferriby & Houston, PC

Michigan Court of Appeals

Decided August 30, 1999No. Docket 207050PublishedCited by 12 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtO’Connell, J.

This legal malpractice case presents the question whether an attorney’s brief revisitation of an otherwise closed case in order to investigate and correct an alleged error attendant to the earlier representation has the effect of extending the previous representation for purposes of identifying when the applicable period of limitation for a malpractice action begins to run, MCL 600.5805(4); MSA 27A.5805(4). The trial court held that in this case it did not. Plaintiff appeals as of right. We affirm.

Plaintiff engaged defendant pursuant to plaintiff’s wish to redeem a worker’s compensation…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. American Employers' Insurance v. Medical Protective Co.Michigan Court of Appeals · 1988
  2. Maddox v. BurlingameMichigan Court of Appeals · 1994
  3. Grievance Administrator v. FriedMichigan Supreme Court · 1997
  4. Bancorp Group, Inc v. Michigan Conference of Teamsters Welfare FundMichigan Court of Appeals · 1998

3Cited by12 opinions

  1. Kloian v. SchwartzMichigan Court of Appeals · 2006
  2. Seyburn, Kahn, Ginn, Bess, Deitch & Serlin, PC v. BakshiMichigan Supreme Court · 2009
  3. Wright v. RinaldoMichigan Court of Appeals · 2008
  4. ANR Pipeline Co. v. 60 Acres of LandDistrict Court, W.D. Michigan · 2006
  5. Henry Nirenberg v. Couzens, Lansky, Fealk, Roeder & Lazar, P.C., et al.District Court, E.D. Michigan · 2025

7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API