Legal Opinion

Henry Nirenberg v. Couzens, Lansky, Fealk, Roeder & Lazar, P.C., et al.

District Court, E.D. Michigan

Decided October 17, 2025No. 2:24-cv-10619Unknown

1Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF MICHIGAN SOUTHERN DIVISION HENRY NIRENBERG, Plaintiff, Case No. 24-cv-10619 v. Honorable Robert J. White COUZENS, LANSKY, FEALK, ROEDER & LAZAR, P.C., et al., Defendants. ORDER (1) DENYING PLAINTIFF’S MOTION TO REMAND; (2) GRANTING SUSAN HABEL’S MOTION TO DISMISS; (3) GRATING IN PART AND DENYING IN PART THE LEGAL DEFENDANTS’ MOTIONS TO DISMISS CROSSCLAIMS; (4) DENYING THE SADECKI DEFENDANTS’ MOTION TO DISMISS PLAINTIFF’S CLAIMS; AND, (5) GRANTING IN PART AND DENYING IN PART THE COUZENS DEFENDANTS’ MOTION TO DISMISS PLAINTIFF’S CLAIMS. This case…

2Cases cited42 opinions

  1. Ashcroft v. IqbalSupreme Court of the United States · 2009
  2. Bell Atlantic Corp. v. TwomblySupreme Court of the United States · 2007
  3. United Mine Workers of America v. GibbsSupreme Court of the United States · 1966
  4. Spokeo, Inc. v. RobinsSupreme Court of the United States · 2016
  5. Bassett v. National Collegiate Athletic Ass'nCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 2008

37 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API