Legal Opinion
Grievance Administrator v. Fried
Michigan Supreme Court
Decided November 18, 1997No. Docket 105562PublishedCited by 10 opinions
1Per curiam
The Grievance Administrator seeks to discipline several lawyers for taking improper steps to obtain the recusal of two circuit judges. A hearing panel granted summary disposition in favor of the lawyers, and the Attorney Discipline Board affirmed. We reverse the judgment of summary disposition, and remand this case to the hearing panel for further proceedings.
i
In a formal complaint, the Grievance Administrator alleges misconduct on the part of respondents Harold S. Fried, Charles J. Golden, and James J. Rostash. Mr. Fried maintains a law office in Oakland County. Messrs. Golden and Rostash…
2Cases cited6 opinions
- In Re RuffaloSupreme Court of the United States · 1968
- Standing Committee on Discipline of the United States District Court for the Central District of California v. Stephen YagmanCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1995
- State Bar Grievance Administrator v. CoraceMichigan Supreme Court · 1973
- Grievance Administrator v. AugustMichigan Supreme Court · 1991
- State Bar Grievance Administrator v. FreidMichigan Supreme Court · 1972
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by10 opinions
- In Re: Bellsouth Corporation, in Re: Terry Price and Lehr, Middlebrooks, Price & Proctor, P.C.Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit · 2003
- Bauer v. Ferriby & Houston, PCMichigan Court of Appeals · 1999
- Wright v. RinaldoMichigan Court of Appeals · 2008
- Disability Advocates & Counseling Group, Inc. v. BetancourtDistrict Court, S.D. Florida · 2005
- Price v. ReishCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 2015
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.