Legal Opinion

ANR Pipeline Co. v. 60 Acres of Land

District Court, W.D. Michigan

Decided February 28, 2006No. 1:04 CV 824PublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION

ROBERT HOLMES BELL, Chief Judge.

Plaintiff ANR Pipeline, Inc. (“ANR”) filed this condemnation action to acquire certain subsurface strata and formations for the storage of natural gas. ANR seeks to condemn only the subsurface formations for storage and not the native gas itself. Defendants/Counter-Plaintiffs Earl G. Coon, Marlene F. Coon, Carl H. Meyer, Dorothy L. Meyer, and William O. Lutz, Trustee of the Eleanor G. Nyquist Lutz Revocable Trust, (collectively referred to as “Defendants”), the owners of the subsurface strata and formations at issue, have filed a counterclaim alleging…

2Cases cited36 opinions

  1. Anderson v. Liberty Lobby, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1986
  2. Celotex Corp. v. Catrett, Administratrix of the Estate of CatrettSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
  3. Matsushita Electric Industrial Co., Ltd. v. Zenith Radio CorporationSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
  4. Peterman v. Department of Natural ResourcesMichigan Supreme Court · 1994
  5. Moll v. Abbott LaboratoriesMichigan Supreme Court · 1993

31 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. Frontier Energy, LLC v. Aurora Energy, Ltd.United States Bankruptcy Court, W.D. Michigan · 2010
  2. Frontier Energy, LLC v. Aurora Energy, Ltd. (In Re Aurora Oil & Gas Corp.)United States Bankruptcy Court, W.D. Michigan · 2010
  3. Michigan GeoSearch, Inc. v. TC Energy CorporationDistrict Court, E.D. Michigan · 2021

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API