Legal Opinion
United States v. Harold Dawson
Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit
Decided May 2, 1975No. 73-2356PublishedCited by 56 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
Before BARNES and BROWNING, Circuit Judges, and McNICHOLS, * District Judge. BARNES, Circuit Judge:
This is an appeal from a one-count conviction of bribery (18 U.S.C. § 201(d)). Appellant was found guilty of making an offer of money on January 4, 1973, with the intent to influence the testimony, under oath, of defendant’s brother, Earl Dawson, respecting the burglary of the United California Bank in Laguna Niguel, California, which had occurred on March 25-26, 1972.
There are three issues raised by appellant. We use our own language to describe them:
1. In withdrawing from the trial…
2Cases cited52 opinions
- Katz v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1967
- Boyd v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1886
- Warden, Maryland Penitentiary v. HaydenSupreme Court of the United States · 1967
- Stirone v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1960
- Russell v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1962
47 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by56 opinions
- United States v. Patricia Campbell HearstCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1977
- United States v. Michael Henry Burns, Vincent M. Andrade, Britt Lance Reynolds, DefendantCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1980
- United States v. David Hall and W. W. TaylorCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1976
- United States v. James J. PazsintCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1983
- United States v. Arnetta WeatherspoonCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1978
51 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.