Legal Opinion
United States v. Alion Andersson, United States of America v. Charles W. Hinck
Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit
Decided May 22, 1987No. 84-1366, 85-1330PublishedCited by 109 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
HUG, Circuit Judge:
In this consolidated appeal, Alion Andersson and Charles W. Hinck appeal their convictions of conspiracy to possess cocaine with intent to distribute in violation of 21 U.S.C. §§ 841(a)(1) and 846 (1982) (“Count One”), possession of 21 kilograms of cocaine with intent to distribute (“Count Two”), and distribution of four kilograms of cocaine (“Count Three”). They argue that (1) the warrantless search of a hotel room containing the cocaine was improper; (2) the trial court erroneously admitted hearsay evidence of a coconspirator’s statement; (3) the trial court erred in…
2Cases cited46 opinions
- Brady v. MarylandSupreme Court of the United States · 1963
- United States v. BagleySupreme Court of the United States · 1985
- Chimel v. CaliforniaSupreme Court of the United States · 1969
- Rakas v. IllinoisSupreme Court of the United States · 1979
- Ohio v. RobertsSupreme Court of the United States · 1980
41 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by109 opinions
- United States v. Sanchez-LopezCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1989
- United States v. Francisco Sangineto-Miranda, (87-5667) Luray Betts, (87-5668) Enrique Vargas, (87-5711) & Benjamin Nelson, (87-5712)Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1990
- United States v. Juan Pimienta-Redondo, United States of America v. Alfredo PupoCourt of Appeals for the First Circuit · 1989
- United States v. Enrique EspinosaCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1987
- United States v. Frederick Ines Gordon, United States of America v. Edward LoeswickCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1988
104 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.