Legal Opinion
Flexfab, LLC v. United States
United States Court of Federal Claims
Decided September 28, 2004No. 02-1096CPublishedCited by 21 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION AND ORDER
BLOCK, Judge.
Flexfab LLC (“Flexfab”) initiated this action for damages, demanding payment for goods delivered to the government. A manufacturer of specialized hose, ducts, connectors, and related products, Flexfab claims that it is a third party beneficiary to a contract between The Defense Logistics Agency, Defense Supply Center Columbus (“DSCC”), and an insolvent contractor, Capital City Pipes, Inc. (“Capital City”). Alternatively, Flexfab claims that it had an implied-in-fact contract with DSCC. The parties have filed cross motions for summary judgment pursuant to Rule 56…
2Cases cited26 opinions
- Anderson v. Liberty Lobby, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Celotex Corp. v. Catrett, Administratrix of the Estate of CatrettSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
- United States v. TestanSupreme Court of the United States · 1976
- United States v. MitchellSupreme Court of the United States · 1980
- Federal Crop Ins. Corp. v. MerrillSupreme Court of the United States · 1947
21 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by21 opinions
- Flexfab, L.L.C. v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 2005
- Fort Lincoln Civic Ass'n v. Fort Lincoln New Town Corp.District of Columbia Court of Appeals · 2008
- Liberty Ammunition, Inc. v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 2016
- Vargas v. United StatesUnited States Court of Federal Claims · 2014
- Telenor Satellite Services, Inc. v. United StatesUnited States Court of Federal Claims · 2006
16 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.