Americanized Finance Corporation v. Yarbrough
Supreme Court of Alabama
1Opinion of the CourtThomas, J.
The suit was for money had by the defendant for the use of the plaintiff. The pleas were the general issue and in short by consent.
The several assignments of error challenge the action of the court in ruling on the admission of evidence and giving and refusing requested charges.
The court instructed the jury, among other things, that, “in substance and effect, the plaintiff alleges in count one of the complaint that the defendant, by its agents, fraudulently represented to plaintiff that, if he would purchase the stock in question, the defendant would return the purchase money to the plaintiff…
2Cases cited31 opinions
- McMillan v. AikenSupreme Court of Alabama · 1920
- Birmingham Railway, Light & Power Co. v. JordanSupreme Court of Alabama · 1910
- Stephenson v. AllisonSupreme Court of Alabama · 1898
- Hall v. HendersonSupreme Court of Alabama · 1899
- Bissell v. HeathMichigan Supreme Court · 1894
26 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by12 opinions
- Bay Minette Land Co. v. StapletonSupreme Court of Alabama · 1932
- Stanard Tilton Milling Co. v. MixonSupreme Court of Alabama · 1942
- Bankers' Mortg. Bond Co. v. RosenthalSupreme Court of Alabama · 1932
- Van Antwerp Realty Corporation v. CookeSupreme Court of Alabama · 1935
- Bynum v. Southern Building & Loan Ass'nSupreme Court of Alabama · 1931
7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.