Legal Opinion
Bankers' Mortg. Bond Co. v. Rosenthal
Supreme Court of Alabama
Decided October 27, 1932No. 6 Div. 987PublishedCited by 15 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtThomas, J.
The submission was -on- motion and the merits,
There are many assignments of error that are submitted with a proper grouping of kindred propositions, and will be so considered by this court. Polytinsky v. Johnston, 211 Ala. 99, 99 So. 839; Southern Ry. Co. v. Cates, 211 Ala. 282, 100 So. 356; Sovereign Camp, W. O. W., v. Craft, 210 Ala. 683, 99 S. E. 167.
The trial was had on count 4 for money had for the use of plaintiff, and on pleas of the general issue, pleas 4 to S, inclusive, fox- merger of agreement into subsequent written subscriptioxx, accord and satisfaction, and the bar of…
2Cases cited65 opinions
- McMillan v. AikenSupreme Court of Alabama · 1920
- Riehle v. MargoliesSupreme Court of the United States · 1929
- Wells Fargo & Co. v. TaylorSupreme Court of the United States · 1920
- Julian v. Central Trust Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1904
- White v. EwingSupreme Court of the United States · 1895
60 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by15 opinions
- Nelson v. LeeSupreme Court of Alabama · 1947
- Mutual Building & Loan Ass'n v. WatsonSupreme Court of Alabama · 1933
- Metropolitan Life Ins. Co. v. JamesSupreme Court of Alabama · 1939
- Metropolitan Life Ins. Co. v. JamesSupreme Court of Alabama · 1934
- Smith v. StateSupreme Court of Alabama · 1935
10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.