Legal Opinion

Willingham v. Lankford

Supreme Court of Alabama

Decided August 27, 1952No. 8 Div. 636PublishedCited by 9 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

FOSTER, Justice.

Relief was denied appellant on her bill filed December 17, 1949, to foreclose a mortgage on a house and lot, given to secure payment of two notes each for $1,-183 with interest from date at six percent.

The answer, in paragraph 1, pleads non est factum and is verified. In the second paragraph it alleges that complainant is not the real party in interest in this suit, but that her husband, I. J. Willingham, is the real party in interest. It then sets up the fact that I. J. Willingham sold her a lot and agreed to build a house on it for' $3,000, the house to be constructed as…

2Cases cited14 opinions

  1. First Nat. Bank of Birmingham v. LoveSupreme Court of Alabama · 1936
  2. Bolling & Son v. PaceSupreme Court of Alabama · 1892
  3. Wimbish v. Montgomery Mutual Building & Loan Ass'nSupreme Court of Alabama · 1881
  4. Stuart v. HoltSupreme Court of Alabama · 1916
  5. Hambrick v. RussellSupreme Court of Alabama · 1888

9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by9 opinions

  1. Frazier v. MaloneSupreme Court of Alabama · 1980
  2. S/M Industries v. Hapag-Lloyd A.G.Supreme Court of Alabama · 1991
  3. Adams v. BakerSupreme Court of Alabama · 1958
  4. Thrash v. DeasonSupreme Court of Alabama · 1983
  5. Hill v. Farmers & Merchants Bank of WaterlooSupreme Court of Alabama · 1994

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API