Legal Opinion

Thrash v. Deason

Supreme Court of Alabama

Decided July 15, 1983No. 82-73, 82-74 and 82-75PublishedCited by 5 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

These cases involve basic contract law issues relating to a promisee's oral release of debt that arose from the sale of stock in an automobile dealership. Plaintiffs, as promisees, sued on promissory notes executed by Defendant. The trial court, finding insufficient evidence of consideration to support the oral release, granted Plaintiffs' summary judgment motions. Defendant appeals, contending the trial court erred by not applying appropriate contract law principles. We reverse and remand.

In January 1977, Plaintiff W.A. Freeman incorporated his Ford dealership in Tallassee, Alabama, which…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. Roberts v. LindseySupreme Court of Alabama · 1942
  2. Willingham v. LankfordSupreme Court of Alabama · 1952
  3. Carpenter v. Murphree & JonesSupreme Court of Alabama · 1873
  4. Baumhauer v. McGillAlabama Court of Appeals · 1917
  5. Word v. SmithSupreme Court of Alabama · 1981

3Cited by5 opinions

  1. Deason v. ThrashSupreme Court of Alabama · 1985
  2. Hartford Accident & Indemnity Co. v. Cochran Plastering Co.Court of Civil Appeals of Alabama · 2006
  3. Financial Underwriters, Inc. v. WarrenCourt of Civil Appeals of Alabama · 1986
  4. Thrash v. DeasonSupreme Court of Alabama · 1983
  5. Turbyfill v. HydeCourt of Civil Appeals of Alabama · 1996

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API