Legal Opinion

First Nat. Bank of Birmingham v. Love

Supreme Court of Alabama

Decided March 12, 1936No. 6 Div. 818, 838, 841PublishedCited by 25 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

BOULDIN, Justice.

This is a creditor’s bill to set aside an instrument creating a “Life Insurance Trust,” upon the ground that it was fraudulent and void as against existing creditors of the grantor, and to subject the proceeds of the policies in the hands of the trustee to the payment of the grantor’s pre-existing debts.

Pertinent provisions of the instrument appear in the report on former appeal. Love et al. v. First Nat. Bank of Birmingham et al., 228 Ala. 258, 153 So. 189. We there held the trust instrument valid in so far as the proceeds of the life insurance policies were charged with the…

2Cases cited30 opinions

  1. Johnson v. WatersSupreme Court of the United States · 1884
  2. Crawford v. KirkseySupreme Court of Alabama · 1876
  3. Snodgrass v. Branch Bank at DecaturSupreme Court of Alabama · 1854
  4. Pharis v. LeachmanSupreme Court of Alabama · 1852
  5. Jones & Co. v. PeeblesSupreme Court of Alabama · 1900

25 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by25 opinions

  1. JC Jacobs Banking Co. v. CampbellSupreme Court of Alabama · 1981
  2. Baldwin v. BurtonUtah Supreme Court · 1993
  3. Hays v. McCartySupreme Court of Alabama · 1940
  4. First Nat. Bank of Birmingham v. BashamSupreme Court of Alabama · 1939
  5. Brown v. AndrewsSupreme Court of Alabama · 1972

20 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API