Legal Opinion

Hill v. Farmers & Merchants Bank of Waterloo

Supreme Court of Alabama

Decided April 29, 1994No. 1930199PublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

The Farmers Merchants Bank of Waterloo brought this declaratory judgment action to have the circuit court determine the priority of conflicting security interests held by the Bank and Krystal Hill in certain logging equipment. The trial court held that the Bank had a valid and enforceable security interest and that Ms. Hill's security interest was void. Ms. Hill appealed.

In May 1988, Jeffery Sharp and Thurman Agee, doing business as T J Logging, approached Krystal Hill's father, Kenneth Dale Hill, and asked him for a loan to help them with their logging business. Ms. Hill's father declined to…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. JC Jacobs Banking Co. v. CampbellSupreme Court of Alabama · 1981
  2. Wimbish v. Montgomery Mutual Building & Loan Ass'nSupreme Court of Alabama · 1881
  3. Willingham v. LankfordSupreme Court of Alabama · 1952

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. Ex Parte HealthSouth Corp.Supreme Court of Alabama · 2007
  2. Int'l Mgmt. Grp., Inc. v. Bryant BankCourt of Civil Appeals of Alabama · 2018
  3. Int'l Mgmt. Grp., Inc. v. Bryant BankCourt of Civil Appeals of Alabama · 2018

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API