Legal Opinion

United States v. Hall

Court of Appeals for the Armed Forces

Decided February 12, 2003No. 02-0243/AR; Crim.App. ARMY 9901124PublishedCited by 23 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Judge ERDMANN

delivered .the opinion of the Court.

Appellant, Sergeant Judy A. Hall, United States Army, was tried by special court-martial at Fort Sill, Oklahoma. Contrary to her plea, she was convicted of a single specification alleging the wrongful use of cocaine, in violation of Article 112a, Uniform Code of Military Justice [hereinafter UCMJ], 10 U.S.C. § 912a (2002). Appellant was sentenced by officer members to a bad-conduct discharge and reduction to E-l. The convening authority approved the sentence. The Army Court of Criminal Appeals affirmed the findings and the sentence in a…

2Cases cited19 opinions

  1. Chapman v. CaliforniaSupreme Court of the United States · 1967
  2. Delaware v. Van ArsdallSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
  3. Arizona v. FulminanteSupreme Court of the United States · 1991
  4. California v. GreenSupreme Court of the United States · 1970
  5. United States v. HarperUnited States Court of Military Appeals · 1986

14 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by23 opinions

  1. United States v. CendejasCourt of Appeals for the Armed Forces · 2006
  2. United States v. SimmonsCourt of Appeals for the Armed Forces · 2004
  3. United States v. OthuruCourt of Appeals for the Armed Forces · 2007
  4. United States v. BushCourt of Appeals for the Armed Forces · 2009
  5. United States v. LongCourt of Appeals for the Armed Forces · 2006

18 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API