Legal Opinion
United States v. Othuru
Court of Appeals for the Armed Forces
Decided December 12, 2007No. 06-0768/NAPublishedCited by 27 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
Judge ERDMANN
delivered the opinion of the court.
Storekeeper Second Class Stanley Othuru was convicted at a general court-martial of making a false official statement and theft of government property as a consequence of his fraudulent collection of basic allowance for housing (BAH) as a married servicemember while he was not legally married. He was sentenced to sixty days of confinement, reduction to E-3, and a fine of $34,000.00. If the fine was not paid, the sentence had a provision for contingent confinement of one year. The convening authority approved the sentence and the United States…
2Cases cited22 opinions
- Chapman v. CaliforniaSupreme Court of the United States · 1967
- Crawford v. WashingtonSupreme Court of the United States · 2004
- Barker v. WingoSupreme Court of the United States · 1972
- Estelle v. McGuireSupreme Court of the United States · 1991
- Delaware v. Van ArsdallSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
17 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by27 opinions
- United States v. HillsCourt of Appeals for the Armed Forces · 2016
- United States v. CollierCourt of Appeals for the Armed Forces · 2009
- United States v. ClaytonCourt of Appeals for the Armed Forces · 2009
- United States v. GardinierCourt of Appeals for the Armed Forces · 2009
- United States v. ChisumUnited States Air Force Court of Criminal Appeals · 2016
22 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.