Steen

Pleading and practice; reference of procedural motions.— On October 21, 1976 the court entered the following order.

Before SkeltON, Judge, Presiding, Nichols and Kashiwa, Judges.

“Plaintiff requests prompt review (Pule 53 (c) (2)), of a trial judge’s interlocutory order. The plaintiff challenges the constitutional validity of a non-judicial punishment meted out to him under purported authority of Article 16, U.C.M.J. The trial judge in a pretrial conference memorandum said the evidence, which he held inadmissible, related only to plaintiff’s version of the incidents that resulted in the Article…