Legal Opinion
Orlando v. Boyd
Supreme Court of South Carolina
Decided January 22, 1996No. 24370PublishedCited by 14 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
Moore, Justice:
Appellants appeal the trial judge’s order excluding an expert witness from testifying. We reverse.
FACTS
In 1988, appellant Ernestine Orlando was diagnosed with a brain tumor. During surgery it was discovered she did not have a brain tumor. Appellants Ernestine and Louis Orlando filed this medical malpractice claim against respondents on October 2, 1991. Dr. Robert Peyster was named as an expert for the Orlandos on December 3,1991.
The trial judge issued a scheduling order on June 24, 1992. The scheduling order provided in pertinent part: “Plaintiffs must make their experts…
2Cases cited4 opinions
- Baughman v. American Telephone & Telegraph Co.Supreme Court of South Carolina · 1991
- Kershaw County Board of Education v. United States Gypsum Co.Supreme Court of South Carolina · 1990
- Dunn v. DunnSupreme Court of South Carolina · 1989
- Campbell v. JohnsonDistrict Court, S.D. New York · 1951
3Cited by14 opinions
- Davis v. Parkview ApartmentsSupreme Court of South Carolina · 2014
- Karppi v. Greenville Terrazzo Co., Inc.Court of Appeals of South Carolina · 1997
- Barnette Ex Rel. Barnette v. Adams Bros. LoggingSupreme Court of South Carolina · 2003
- Bryson v. BrysonCourt of Appeals of South Carolina · 2008
- Griffin Grading & Clearing, Inc. v. Tire Service Equipment Manufacturing Co.Court of Appeals of South Carolina · 1999
9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.