Karppi v. Greenville Terrazzo Co., Inc.
Court of Appeals of South Carolina
1Opinion of the Court
HOWELL, Chief Judge:
The trial court struck the pleadings of Ogden Teck, Inc. and ordered it in default as a sanction for failing to comply with discovery orders. Ogden Teck appeals. We reverse and remand.
I
Respondent, Paul Karppi d/b/a P/C Technology (Karppi), brought this action in June 1995 against Appellant Ogden Teck, and its co-defendant, Greenville Terrazzo Co., Inc. (Terrazzo). Karppi’s complaint alleges various causes of action arising from Karppi’s purchase from Terrazzo of floor covering material that was manufactured by Ogden Teck. Terrazzo and Ogden Teck denied liability, and Ogden…
Also in this document: Concurrence.
2Cases cited9 opinions
- National Hockey League v. Metropolitan Hockey Club, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1976
- Baughman v. American Telephone & Telegraph Co.Supreme Court of South Carolina · 1991
- Kershaw County Board of Education v. United States Gypsum Co.Supreme Court of South Carolina · 1990
- Darden v. WithamSupreme Court of South Carolina · 1974
- Clark v. RossCourt of Appeals of South Carolina · 1985
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by13 opinions
- Voss v. Pujdak (In Re Pujdak)United States Bankruptcy Court, D. South Carolina · 2011
- Davis v. Parkview ApartmentsSupreme Court of South Carolina · 2014
- Skywaves I Corp. v. Branch Banking & Trust Co.Court of Appeals of South Carolina · 2018
- Griffin Grading & Clearing, Inc. v. Tire Service Equipment Manufacturing Co.Court of Appeals of South Carolina · 1999
- Qzo, Inc. v. MoyerCourt of Appeals of South Carolina · 2004
8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.