Legal Opinion
Johnson v. Goldstein
District Court, E.D. Pennsylvania
Decided April 28, 1994No. 93-CV-1524PublishedCited by 6 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
MEMORANDUM AND ORDER
JOYNER, District Judge.
By way of the instant motion, the defendants in this civil personal injury action for the second time argue that they are entitled to the entry of summary judgment in their favor as a matter of law, this time on the basis of Pennsylvania’s two-year statute of limitations. Like its predecessor, this motion is also denied for the reasons set forth in the paragraphs which follow.
I. HISTORY OF THE CASE.
This case arose on July 13, 1991 when the plaintiff, Heather Johnson, was sexually assaulted and robbed by an unidentified criminal assailant in the…
2Cases cited13 opinions
- Itel Capital Corporation, a Corporation, Cross-Appellant v. Cups Coal Company, Incorporated, a Corporation and Herman Mulvehill, Cross-AppelleesCourt of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit · 1983
- Advanced Power Systems, Inc. v. Hi-Tech Systems, Inc.District Court, E.D. Pennsylvania · 1992
- Harold l.loudenslager v. Margaret Bittinger TeepleCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1972
- Kinnally v. Bell of PennsylvaniaDistrict Court, E.D. Pennsylvania · 1990
- Raymond Jonathan Hill v. United States Postal ServiceCourt of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit · 1992
8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by6 opinions
- Forman v. Salzano (In Re Norvergence, Inc.)United States Bankruptcy Court, D. New Jersey · 2009
- Wine v. Emsa Ltd. PartnershipDistrict Court, E.D. Pennsylvania · 1996
- Wilkins v. Methodist Health Care System, Texas Court of Appeals, 14th District (Houston)2003
- Phillips v. GieringerAlaska Supreme Court · 2005
- RICHARDSON v. BARBOURDistrict Court, E.D. Pennsylvania · 2020
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.