Legal Opinion
Harold l.loudenslager v. Margaret Bittinger Teeple
Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit
Decided August 1, 1972No. 71-1764PublishedCited by 51 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION OF THE COURT
STALEY, Circuit Judge.
On April 5, 1968, Harold L. Loudenslager, the appellant in this case, was involved in an automobile accident and suffered injuries. The driver of one of the other cars involved in this accident was Margaret Bittinger Teeple. Asserting that she had negligently caused the accident, Mr. Loudenslager began an action against Margaret Teeple to recover for his injuries by filing a complaint on March 18, 1970, in the United States District Court for the Middle District of Pennsylvania.
This complaint asserted that the defendant was a resident of Maryland, and…
2Cases cited10 opinions
- Erie Railroad v. TompkinsSupreme Court of the United States · 1938
- Thompson v. PeckSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1935
- Newman v. FreemanDistrict Court, E.D. Pennsylvania · 1966
- Ehrhardt v. CostelloSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1970
- Moul v. PaceDistrict Court, D. Maryland · 1966
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by51 opinions
- Vaughn v. SpeakerIllinois Supreme Court · 1988
- Sidney Lundy Claire Lundy v. Adamar of New Jersey, Inc., T/a Trop World, Defendant/third Party v. Dr. Domenic Frank Carlino, Individually Dr. Domenic Frank Carlino, a Professional Association, Third-PartyCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1994
- Ingram v. KumarCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1978
- Holdridge v. Heyer-Schulte Corp. of Santa BarbaraDistrict Court, N.D. New York · 1977
- Advanced Power Systems, Inc. v. Hi-Tech Systems, Inc.District Court, E.D. Pennsylvania · 1992
46 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.