Legal Opinion
Wine v. Emsa Ltd. Partnership
District Court, E.D. Pennsylvania
Decided May 22, 1996No. 94-4006PublishedCited by 12 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
MEMORANDUM
EDUARDO C. ROBRENO, District Judge.
Plaintiff Carolyn Wine has brought suit against EMSA Limited Partnership (“EMSA”), the County of Delaware and six named correctional officers to recover for injuries she allegedly sustained as a result of the improper medical treatment she was allegedly given upon her arrest. Plaintiff seeks damages against EMSA based on a negligence theory and against all other Defendants for violations of her civil rights under 42 U.S.C. § 1983. Currently before the Court is Plaintiffs motion for leave to file a “Third Amended Complaint”1 adding two new parties,…
2Cases cited26 opinions
- Foman v. DavisSupreme Court of the United States · 1962
- Schiavone v. FortuneSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Denise Bohus v. Stanley A. BeloffCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1991
- Ruth Ann Bougher v. University of Pittsburgh, Wesley W. Posvar and Trevor Melia, in Their Official and Individual Capacities, Mary-Ann Bishop CoffeyCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1989
- Cresswell v. Sullivan & CromwellCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1990
21 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by12 opinions
- Resource Ventures, Inc. v. Resources Management International, Inc.District Court, D. Delaware · 1999
- Fields v. BlakeDistrict Court, E.D. Pennsylvania · 2004
- Markhorst v. Ridgid, Inc.District Court, E.D. Pennsylvania · 2007
- Arce Bucetta v. Motorola Electrónica De P.R.Supreme Court of Puerto Rico · 2008
- Arce Bucetta v. Motorola Electrónica de Puerto Rico, Inc.Supreme Court of Puerto Rico · 2008
7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.