Legal Opinion

Swanson v. Boschen

Supreme Court of Connecticut

Decided January 27, 1956PublishedCited by 27 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtBaldwin, J.

This is an action brought by the plaintiffs pursuant to a federal statute to recover money paid as rent to the defendant in excess of the amount fixed by the area rent director. 61 Stat. 199, as amended, 50 U.S.C. App. § 1895 (Sup. 4, 1951). The plaintiffs demanded as damages not merely the amount of the overcharge but three times that amount plus reasonable attorney’s fees. The statute allows recovery of three times the over charge as a penalty, if the violation was wilful or resulted from the failure of the landlord to take practicable precautions against its occurrence. The plaintiffs…

2Cases cited19 opinions

  1. National Labor Relations Board v. Jones & Laughlin Steel Corp.Supreme Court of the United States · 1937
  2. Arnstein v. PorterCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1946
  3. Woods v. StoneSupreme Court of the United States · 1948
  4. State v. TorelloSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1925
  5. Dawson v. Town of OrangeSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1905

14 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by27 opinions

  1. Ford v. Blue Cross & Blue Shield of Connecticut, Inc.Supreme Court of Connecticut · 1990
  2. Cumberland Farms, Inc. v. Town of GrotonSupreme Court of Connecticut · 2002
  3. Bishop v. KellySupreme Court of Connecticut · 1988
  4. Skinner v. AnglikerSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1989
  5. Bender v. BenderSupreme Court of Connecticut · 2009

22 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API