Legal Opinion

Brunner v. Rhodes

Ohio Court of Appeals

Decided March 23, 1953No. 4730PublishedCited by 4 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtHornbeck, J.

This is an appeal on questions of law and fact from a judgment of the Common Pleas Court in favor of the plaintiffs.

The issues are drawn on an amended petition, the answer thereto, a supplemental petition, a second supplemental petition, a joint answer thereto, a reply and a supplemental reply. The supplemental pleadings were made necessary because of certain regulations of the defendants enacted subsequent to the filing of the amended petition.

By their pleadings, plaintiffs seek a declaratory judgment defining their rights under certain regulations providing for the inspection of slaughter…

2Cases cited8 opinions

  1. Ohio Ex Rel. Davis v. HildebrantSupreme Court of the United States · 1916
  2. Prudential Co-Operative Realty Co. v. City of YoungstownOhio Supreme Court · 1928
  3. State, Ex Rel. Mowrer v. UnderwoodOhio Supreme Court · 1940
  4. Holcomb, Aud. v. State, Ex Rel.Ohio Supreme Court · 1933
  5. City of Dayton v. JacobsOhio Supreme Court · 1929

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. Casey v. City of YoungstownOhio Court of Appeals · 1967
  2. Cooperative Pure Milk Assn. v. Board of HealthOhio Court of Appeals · 1969
  3. State v. SouthOhio Court of Appeals · 1967
  4. Wetterer v. Hamilton County BoardOhio Supreme Court · 1957

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API