Legal Opinion

City of Dayton v. Jacobs

Ohio Supreme Court

Decided February 6, 1929No. 21261PublishedCited by 11 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

The major question presented by this cause in this court is whether the provisions of the ordinances in question, which impose an inspection fee upon the plaintiff in error and others similarly situated for inspection service rendered by the municipality and do not impose an inspection fee upon certain other establishments engaged in the same occupation, which receive a free inspection service from the federal government and do not require or receive an inspection service from the municipality, are for that reason invalid.

The other questions sought to be raised here are either questions of…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. Prudential Co-Operative Realty Co. v. City of YoungstownOhio Supreme Court · 1928
  2. State ex rel. Mount Pleasant Bank v. ConwayOhio Supreme Court · 1849

3Cited by11 opinions

  1. Salt Lake City v. Bennion Gas & Oil Co.Utah Supreme Court · 1932
  2. Tovrea Packing Co. v. Livestock Sanitary BoardArizona Supreme Court · 1934
  3. City of Portsmouth v. McGrawOhio Supreme Court · 1986
  4. City of Cleveland v. TerrillOhio Supreme Court · 1948
  5. Brunner v. RhodesOhio Court of Appeals · 1953

6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API