Legal Opinion

State v. Hester

Supreme Court of Minnesota

Decided April 27, 2011No. A09-1784PublishedCited by 6 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION

GILDEA, Chief Justice.

The question presented in this ease is whether a Lower Sioux Indian Community (“Lower Sioux”) police officer is a peace officer authorized to invoke the implied-consent law and request that a person suspected of driving while impaired submit to a chemical test for the presence of alcohol or controlled substances. Because we conclude that the Lower Sioux must have liability insurance limits in the amounts required by statute in order for a Lower Sioux police officer to qualify as a peace officer under MinmStat. § 169A.03, subd. 18(3) (2010), and because those…

2Cases cited6 opinions

  1. City of Minneapolis v. WurteleSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1980
  2. State, by Lord v. FrisbySupreme Court of Minnesota · 1961
  3. State v. FrinkSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1973
  4. Roby v. StateSupreme Court of Minnesota · 2010
  5. State v. QuinnSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1989

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by6 opinions

  1. State v. CaldwellSupreme Court of Minnesota · 2011
  2. Hester v. Redwood CountyDistrict Court, D. Minnesota · 2012
  3. State v. PetersenCourt of Appeals of Minnesota · 2011
  4. State v. ThompsonCourt of Appeals of Minnesota · 2019
  5. Minnwest Bank v. ArendsCourt of Appeals of Minnesota · 2011

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API