Legal Opinion

State v. Petersen

Court of Appeals of Minnesota

Decided July 5, 2011No. A10-416PublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION

MUEHLBERG, Judge.*

Appellant challenges his conviction of intentional second-degree murder, arguing that the district court erred in denying his postconviction petition to withdraw his guilty plea. Appellant contends that his guilty plea was not accurate because he intended to kill an unborn child so he cannot be held legally responsible for killing the victim who died after she was born alive. Appellant also argues that an upward sentencing departure was not justified because it was based solely on the parties’ plea agreement. Because appellant’s intentional actions caused the death of…

2Cases cited20 opinions

  1. Blakely v. WashingtonSupreme Court of the United States · 2004
  2. Williams v. StateSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1985
  3. State v. MisquadaceSupreme Court of Minnesota · 2002
  4. State v. EckerSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1994
  5. State v. BolsingerSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1946

15 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. State v. RushtonCourt of Appeals of Minnesota · 2012
  2. State of Minnesota v. Marquin Lamont CraigCourt of Appeals of Minnesota · 2014
  3. State of Minnesota v. Rafael Antonio AlfaroCourt of Appeals of Minnesota · 2014

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API