Legal Opinion
Tradex, Inc. v. Modern Merchandising, Inc.
Court of Appeals of Minnesota
Decided May 13, 1986No. CO-85-2320, C2-85-2321PublishedCited by 4 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
LANSING, Judge.
Tradex brought this action against La-Belle’s and Modern Merchandising for wrongful payment of accounts receivable to the assignor, All Freight Transportation, Inc. The trial court ruled that All Freight was Tradex’s agent for payment as a matter of law, based on the terms of the contract between Tradex and All Freight. Tradex appeals the summary judgment; we reverse and remand for trial.
FACTS
In March 1982, All Freight Transportation, Inc., an Idaho corporation, entered into a “factoring agreement” with Tradex, an Oregon corporation. Under the contract Tradex agreed to…
2Cases cited4 opinions
- Vacura v. Haar's Equipment, Inc.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 1985
- Ertel v. Radio Corporation of AmericaIndiana Supreme Court · 1974
- Daly v. ShrimplinWyoming Supreme Court · 1980
- Dworsky v. Unger Furniture Co.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 1942
3Cited by4 opinions
- Texas Development Co. v. Exxon Mobil Corp., Texas Court of Appeals, 11th District (Eastland)2003
- Bay Area Factors v. Target Stores, Inc.District Court, D. Minnesota · 1997
- National Trade Trust, Inc. v. Merrimac ConstructionCourt of Appeals of Minnesota · 1994
- the Texas Development Company, as Leasing Agent for LPS 529 35, Ltd. v. Exxon Mobil Corporation, Texas Court of Appeals, 11th District (Eastland)2003