Legal Opinion

Bay Area Factors v. Target Stores, Inc.

District Court, D. Minnesota

Decided December 2, 1997No. Civ. 3-96-576PublishedCited by 4 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

MEMORANDUM AND ORDER

MAGNUSON, Chief Judge.

This matter is before the Court upon Plaintiff Bay Area Factors’s Motion for Summary Judgment. Additionally, Defendant Target Stores, Inc., in its brief, has requested that summary judgment be granted in its favor. For the following reasons, the Court grants Plaintiff Bay Area Factors’s motion.

BACKGROUND

At all times relevant to this lawsuit, Platinum Merchandising, Inc. (“Platinum”) was a vendor to Defendant Target Stores (“Target”). Target assigned Vendor # 3813951 to Platinum on Target’s accounts payable system. In July 1994, Target received…

2Cases cited12 opinions

  1. Anderson v. Liberty Lobby, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1986
  2. Celotex Corp. v. Catrett, Administratrix of the Estate of CatrettSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
  3. Melvin E. Levinson v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1992
  4. Bank of Salt Lake v. Corporation of the President of the Church of Jesus Christ of Latter-Day SaintsUtah Supreme Court · 1975
  5. First Nat'l Bank of Antioch v. GUERRA CONST. CO.Appellate Court of Illinois · 1987

7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. State v. ProfitSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1999
  2. Bldg. Materials v. Presidential FinancialDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 2008
  3. Lake City Bank v. R.T. Milord Co.District Court, N.D. Illinois · 2019
  4. State v. ProfitSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1999

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API