Legal Opinion
Daly v. Shrimplin
Wyoming Supreme Court
Decided May 1, 1980No. 5192, 5193PublishedCited by 19 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
ROONEY, Justice.
The appeals in the two cases here consolidated are from a single judgment which held in effect that appellant in Case No. 5192 did not have a valid security interest under the Uniform Commercial Code in an account receivable, and that appellant in Case No. 5193 did not have a right of setoff with reference to payment of an account receivable.
We reverse the effect of the judgment as to both questions, and we reverse the judgment in part and affirm it in part as it relates to the complaint, counterclaims and cross claim.
Jack F. Nuzum (hereinafter referred to as Nuzum) was in the…
2Cases cited8 opinions
- Bank of N. America v. Bank of NutleyNew Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · 1967
- Bramble Transportation, Inc. v. Sam Senter Sales, Inc.Superior Court of Delaware · 1971
- Vittert Construction & Investment Co. v. Wall Covering Contractors, Inc.Missouri Court of Appeals · 1971
- Craig v. GudimWyoming Supreme Court · 1971
- Bramble Transportation, Inc. v. Sam Senter Sales, Inc.Supreme Court of Delaware · 1972
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by19 opinions
- Swiden Appliance & Furniture, Inc. v. National Bank of South DakotaSouth Dakota Supreme Court · 1984
- Texas Development Co. v. Exxon Mobil Corp., Texas Court of Appeals, 11th District (Eastland)2003
- OCTAGON GAS SYSTEMS, INC., Appellant, v. Roy T. RIMMER, Appellee, in Re MERIDIAN RESERVE, INC., DebtorCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1993
- Bank of Hawaii v. Davis Radio Sales & Service, Inc.Hawaii Intermediate Court of Appeals · 1986
- Farns Associates, Inc. v. South Side BankAppellate Court of Illinois · 1981
14 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.