Legal Opinion
United States v. Oatney
Navy-Marine Corps Court of Criminal Appeals
Decided November 4, 1994No. NMCM 92 02024PublishedCited by 10 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
REED, Senior Judge:
This case involves several assignments of error, most of which are addressed later in this opinion.1 Of primary concern to us is the multiplicity issue raised by the appellant in his second assignment of error. In that regard, we are called upon to interpret the doctrine of multiplicity as enunciated by the U.S. Court of Military Appeals in United States v. Teters, 37 M.J. 370 (C.M.A. 1993), cert. denied, — U.S.-, 114 S.Ct. 919, 127 L.Ed.2d 213 (1994). Our case involves a determination of whether obstruction of justice and the communication of a threat are multiplieious…
2Cases cited40 opinions
- Jackson v. VirginiaSupreme Court of the United States · 1979
- United States v. OlanoSupreme Court of the United States · 1993
- Blockburger v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1931
- North Carolina v. PearceSupreme Court of the United States · 1969
- United States v. FradySupreme Court of the United States · 1982
35 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by10 opinions
- United States v. OatneyCourt of Appeals for the Armed Forces · 1996
- United States v. BalcarczykNavy-Marine Corps Court of Criminal Appeals · 2000
- United States v. CampbellNavy-Marine Corps Court of Criminal Appeals · 2008
- United States v. JoyceNavy-Marine Corps Court of Criminal Appeals · 1999
- United States v. DavisUnited States Air Force Court of Criminal Appeals · 2006
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.