Legal Opinion
United States v. Joyce
Navy-Marine Corps Court of Criminal Appeals
Decided February 10, 1999No. NMCM 98 00280PublishedCited by 6 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
LEO, Senior Judge:
We have examined the record of trial, the appellant’s assignments of error, and the Government’s response. We conclude that the assignments of error are without merit, the findings and the sentence are correct in law and fact, and no error materially prejudicial to the substantial rights of the appellant was committed. Articles 59(a) and 66(c), Uniform Code of Military Justice, 10 U.S.C. §§ 859(a) and 866(c) (1994).
The appellant was convicted, pursuant to his pleas, at a special court-martial before military judge alone of two specifications of unauthorized absence, three…
2Cases cited13 opinions
- United States v. BroceSupreme Court of the United States · 1989
- United States v. PraterUnited States Court of Military Appeals · 1991
- United States v. SnellingUnited States Court of Military Appeals · 1982
- United States v. HealyUnited States Court of Military Appeals · 1988
- United States v. FosterUnited States Court of Military Appeals · 1994
8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by6 opinions
- United States v. QuirozNavy-Marine Corps Court of Criminal Appeals · 2000
- United States v. QuirozNavy-Marine Corps Court of Criminal Appeals · 1999
- United States v. BalcarczykNavy-Marine Corps Court of Criminal Appeals · 2000
- United States v. TollinchiNavy-Marine Corps Court of Criminal Appeals · 1999
- United States v. RayNavy-Marine Corps Court of Criminal Appeals · 1999
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.