Legal Opinion

United States v. Oatney

Court of Appeals for the Armed Forces

Decided September 30, 1996No. 95-0280; Crim.App. No. 92-2024PublishedCited by 37 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Opinion of the Court

SULLIVAN, Judge:

In April of 1992, appellant was tried by a general court-martial composed of a military judge sitting alone at Okinawa, Japan. Pursuant to his pleas, he was found guilty of an assault in which grievous bodily harm was intentionally inflicted. Contrary to his pleas, he was found guilty of obstructing justice and communicating a threat (2 specifications), in violation of Articles 128 and 134, Uniform Code of Military Justice, 10 USC §§ 928 and 934, respectively. He was sentenced to a dishonorable discharge, confinement for 4 years, total forfeitures, and…

2Cases cited15 opinions

  1. Blockburger v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1931
  2. Ball v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1985
  3. Rutledge v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1996
  4. United States v. TetersUnited States Court of Military Appeals · 1993
  5. United States v. FosterUnited States Court of Military Appeals · 1994

10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by37 opinions

  1. United States v. LloydCourt of Appeals for the Armed Forces · 1997
  2. United States v. QuirozNavy-Marine Corps Court of Criminal Appeals · 2000
  3. United States v. HarwoodCourt of Appeals for the Armed Forces · 1997
  4. United States v. ErbyUnited States Air Force Court of Criminal Appeals · 1997
  5. United States v. ZacharyArmy Court of Criminal Appeals · 2005

32 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API